Notre Dame fire: the alt-right reaction and who the real enemy is

Exactly one week ago the famous Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris was severely damaged by fire. It seems that the official explanation at this point appears to be that the fire was accidental. Of course, this hasn’t stopped the alt-right talking heads from implying that it was probably the work of Muslims as part of a campaign against the Christian West and suspecting a cover-up by officials.

It is not the point of this post to argue for or against the theory of Muslim involvement in the fire. There does seem to be reasons to suspect that the event could be arson. It appears that there has been a string of attacks of one sort or another on Christian churches in France of late and a former chief architect and engineer for Notre Dame Cathedral expressed doubts that the fire could have been accidental, stating:

I don’t understand this at all. The fire’s spread is extremely curious. With really old oak like that, it’s super-hard, so you’d need a lot of smaller wood to first get the fire hot enough for the oak beams to burn.

He added that “In 40 years of experience, I have never heard of a fire like this.” You can read his full comments here.

What I want to address in this post is not the fire itself but the notion peddled on the alt-right – in particular the pro-Zionist wing of the alt-right known as the ‘alt-lite’ – that the main enemy of the West is Islam. These alt-liters love to talk about the dangers of Islam to Europe and it’s Christian heritage whilst constantly giving Jews a free-pass despite the fact that Jews are largely responsible for the migrant situation that Europe is currently experiencing (see the videos here and here). They also ignore the historical grudges that many Jewish Rabbi’s hold against Europe and Christianity which they preach to their flocks. When an Islamic cleric preaches hatred of Western and/or Christian civilisation it is taken by the alt-right as proof positive of widespread malign intent on the part of Muslims whilst Jewish Rabbis making similar statements generally gets brushed off as just the ravings of a minority of extremists. With some exceptions, it seems that within the alt-right sphere there is one rule for Muslims and another for Jews.

On the day of the Notre Dame fire, alt-lite figure Paul Joseph Watson was quick to tweet that people with Arabic names were reacting to the fire with smiley face emojis. I’m not questioning the veracity of this, just pointing out the reaction. Another alt-liter, the former Rebel Media operative Katie Hopkins, tweeted the following:

Jewish & Christian Parisians have been warning for a long time. They are being hunted out of their city by Islamists, fleeing in their thousands They are hounded from their former home. “Paris is lost” #NotreDame

Notice the need to push the Jewish victimisation narrative, even referring to Jews first before Christians whilst the big news event of the day was the burning of a Christian site. This is typical of the alt-lite crowd, pushing Jewish victimhood and presenting Muslims as the sole enemy and problem facing Europe and the Western world. Again, like with Paul Watson’s tweet, I’m not challenging the veracity of the statement. Jewish communities may well feel afraid of Islamic migrants. I’m simply highlighting Hopkins’ pro-Jewish stance. For the alt-lite, Jews and Israel can do no wrong.

Jewish hatred of Christianity

I’m now going to cover the comments of Jewish Rabbis who have made revealing statements which show the utter distain that exists within Judaism towards non-Jews in general and Christianity in particular. I’m not accusing Jews – or anybody – of setting fire to Notre Dame. I’m simply pointing out that Christianity has another, more pernicious enemy. I’m also not a Christian (or adherent to any other religion or creed), so I’m just presenting information here… nothing else.

In an article titled Islamization of Europe a good thing, Ynet News reports on the comments of West Bank Rabbi, Baruch Efrati. The article begins:

Rabbi Baruch Efrati believes Jews should ‘rejoice at the fact that Europe is paying for what it did to us for hundreds of years by losing its identity.’ He praises Islam for promoting modesty, respect for God.

During a question and answer session with students a question was asked about the issue of the Islamification of Europe, the article reports:

Efrati wrote in response that the Islamization of Europe was better than a Christian Europe for ethical and theological reasons – as a punishment against Christians for persecuting the Jews and the fact that Christianity, as opposed to Islam, is considered “idolatry” from a halachic point of view.

The article quotes Efrati as saying:

“Jews should rejoice at the fact that Christian Europe is losing its identity as a punishment for what it did to us for the hundreds of years were in exile there”

“We will never forgive Europe’s Christians for slaughtering millions of our children, women and elderly… Not just in the recent Holocaust, but throughout the generations, in a consistent manner which characterizes all factions of hypocritical Christianity…

“A now, Europe is losing its identity in favor of another people and another religion, and there will be no remnants and survivors from the impurity of Christianity, which shed a lot of blood it won’t be able to atone for.” 

He went on to add:

“even if we are in a major war with the region’s Arabs over the Land of Israel, Islam is still much better as a gentile culture than Christianity.”

During an internet sermon Rabbi David Titou made the following comments (emphasis added):

You will pay dearly for it Europeans! To such an extent that you have no idea! And you will have no place to run to. Because all the evil you have done to Israel [the Jews], you will pay for it a hundred-fold. When Italy will be gone, when Edom (that is why Christianity’s headquarters, which come from ‘Hessal’, is there), when that place will be gone, and that’s what Islam is going to do. Islam is the broom of Israel, you have to know it. So, instead of having us do all the job, He sends Ishmael to solve the problem.”

What you are undergoing in France, in Europe, which is so scary, it should be for us the most beautiful news of our Jewish history. Finally, we begin to approach it! Finally, we begin to realize what the sages had predicted before. What I told you before is written in Sanhedrin [book of the Talmud]. The Messiah will come only when Edom, Europe, Christianity will have fallen completely. So, I am asking you the question: Is it good news that Islam is invading Europe? It’s excellent news! It’s announcing the arrival of the Messiah! Excellent news!

Note: The highlighted portions above should be kept in mind when it comes to the central role of Jews in promoting refugees and mass migration into Europe.

In his article Extremist Rabbis: Talmudic prophecies call for destruction of Europe, war between Christians and Muslims, Sean Jobst remarks on the Rabbis quoted above. He writes:

These are stunning admissions, especially in light of the mass-migration of mostly Muslim migrants into Europe that has been promoted from the top-bottom by Jewish bankers and politicians, NGOs, think-tanks and organizations – even while solidifying the exclusively Jewish character of Israel. The main reason behind this is revealed by these rabbis: a deep-seated hatred of Europeans, whom they collectively blame for centuries of “anti-Semitism”. Another reason is a “clash of civilizations,” wars between Christians and Muslims for the benefit of Zionism.

In the wake of the Notre Dame fire the Times of Israel reported on the comments of Rabbi Shlomo Aviner. The article begins:

A prominent religious-Zionist rabbi known for his extremist views suggested on Wednesday that the fire that gutted the famed Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris earlier this week may have been divine retribution for the mass-burning of Talmud volumes by French Catholic priests in the city eight centuries earlier.

The article continues (emphasis added):

Christianity, he explained, “is our number one enemy throughout history. [They] tried to convert us by arguments and by force, carried out an inquisition against us, burned the Talmud, expulsions, pogroms. Western anti-Semitism draws from Christianity’s hatred of the ‘murderers of God.’ It also had a role in the Holocaust.”

Sean Jobst in his article Fanatic Israeli rabbis celebrate burning of Notre Dame as Talmudic vengeance reacts to the Rabbi’s comments stating:

These are all standard talking-points of various Jewish leaders, academics and rabbis, who see “anti-Semitism” as innate within European heritage and history, failing to introspectively ask themselves why Jews were expelled from 109 various countries of different ethnicities, languages and religions, if not perhaps the supremacist mentality and actions bred from the very Talmud whose burning he lamented.

The Times Of Israel article continues:

He suggested the Notre Dame fire may be divine retribution for the mass-burning of Talmud manuscripts near the cathedral in 1242, following a Talmudic disputation.

“The first great Talmud burning happened in Paris, right there at the Notre Dame Cathedral square,” Aviner wrote. “It was the result of the Paris trial in which Jewish sages were forced to debate Christian sages, and the result was the burning of the Talmud. Volumes of Talmud were brought in 20 carts and burned there, 1,200 Talmud volumes. So [the fire demonstrates] ‘there is justice and there is a Judge,’” he wrote, the quote a reference in Jewish religious literature to divine justice 

Although Aviner doesn’t advocate the burning of churches abroad he stated that in the land of Israel the situation is “more complicated.”  The website Mondoweiss reports (emphasis added):

Prominent settler rabbi, Shlomo Aviner, ruled today (Tuesday) that burning churches outside of the Land of Yisrael “isn’t our job for now”, but as for the Holy Land, “the issue is more complicated”.

In response to a question about whether Jews should be sad or rejoice at the burning down of Notre Dame Cathedral Aviner responded:

“This isn’t our job for now. There is no mitzvah to seek out churches abroad and burn them down. In our holy land, however, the issue is more complicated. Indeed, the Satmar Rabbi noted one of his arguments against immigrating to Israel, that here it is indeed a mitzvah to burn churches; and by not doing so, those [immigrating to Israel] are committing a sin. Yet Rabbi Menachem Mendel Kasher, in his book ‘The Great Period’, rejected the Satmar Rabbi’s words, citing a midrash, forbidding burning [churches], since if we burn, we’ll have to rebuild, and it’s a greater sin to rebuild [a church] than leave it standing. [Here Aviner cites his own book vs. the Satmar Rabbi] That church in Paris, too, will surely be rebuilt.”

This prompted the writer of the piece, Yossi Gurvits to write:

Oh, yes: American Jewish readers, I probably need to stress this – this is not a parody or a satire. This is actual rabbinical discourse in 2019 Israel.

He concludes his article by stating:

Note that Aviner is walking a very tight rope here. He is dismissing out hand the burning of churches abroad, but when it comes to burning churches in Israel, he quotes two sources, not giving his own ruling. The fact that he has to walk this tightrope says volumes about the discourse among his followers and students.

Sean Jobst remarks:

This last statement is especially significant, first because “this isn’t our job, for now” is a nod to the messianic impulse, where its believed it will be achieved by their “moshiach” so that its now merely a question of timing. Second, that in lieu of this “moshiach” the State of Israel itself is regarded as the staging ground for such actions which might not be acceptable elsewhere, if for nothing else in the realm of Public Relations so as to not provoke outrage against Jews. Aviner only opposes burning a church or other Gentile religious site, although stressing its a different case within Israel, for fear it would then be rebuilt. But simply allowing those sites to fall into disrepair would absolve Jews from the possible “sin”.

Note: I wonder what else might allow Jews to absolve themselves? Using proxies to do their dirty work perhaps? I wonder if Aviner would have a problem with his fellow Jews aiding and abetting another group hostile to Christianity to enter Europe in the hope they might attack some holy sites? I’ve got a feeling he’d approve. What was it Rabbi Titou said? “Islam is the broom of Israel, you have to know it.

Paris-based Irish Journalist Gearóid Ó Colmáin writes in a piece on his website:

Asked if his comments might offend Christians, the rabbi replied: “ Of course, but we really should not express too much sympathy”. He said it is possible the fire was a punishment of Catholics from God for their “idolatry.” He said Muslims have the same view.

Aviner claims Christians are the number one enemies of the Jews and should be punished. Christians he states, tried to convert Jews and are responsible for the Holocaust.

So, according to Rabbi Aviner, for the moment Jews are not obliged to burn churches unless they are in Israel. Now, isn’t that good news! The persecution of Christians in Israel is well documented. In fact, it is now predicted that there may soon be no more Christians in Israel due to persecution. The churches are being burnt down by extremist Jews.

The Mondowiess article also touches on the phenomenon of church attacks within Israel:

Several churches have been burnt in Israel in the last few years, and the police have been spectacularly useless in capturing the arsonists. In several cases, the arson was accompanied by slogans familiar from ‘price tag’ attacks in the West Bank (mostly along the lines of Jewish vengeance). Four years ago, Lehava leader Benzi Gopstein, asked whether he supported church burnings, said “of course, what’s the question?” His words caused uproar. Later Gopstein was indicted on incitement to violence charges, but church burning wasn’t one of them.

On the issue of Christian persecution in Israel a Ynet News Op-ed piece titled Christians’ life in Israel not so wonderful explains:

Jews in Israel fire gunshots inside churches and set fire to monasteries, spray-paint malicious graffiti and slash the tires of Christians’ cars. In the Old City of Jerusalem, religious Jews spit on monks, and in Christian cemeteries gravestones are shattered. Death threats are sent to bishops and heads of Christian communities.

Dozens of hate crimes – and the authorities stand idly by, apart from a few words of condemnation to do the minimum.

For more on the church attacks in Israel see here. Mosques have also been a target in Israel and, interestingly, as Notre Dame was burning a fire also broke out at the Al Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem. For more on the importance of this mosque in the context of the Zionist agenda and prophesy see this post.

Sabbatean-Frankists, Masons & Kabbalah:

I’ve covered the Sabbatean-Frankists and Freemasonry in more detail in my post Tommy Robinson’s hard-on for Israel and what that country is really all about. I would recommend reading it to more fully understand this piece. In it I explain how the global elite is essentially a convergence of masonic secret societies and elite Sabbatean-Frankist Jews (see here and here) who are seeking to make Jerusalem the capital of a world empire (the New World Order) and to tear down the Al-Aqsa mosque and rebuild Solomon’s Temple (aka the Third Temple). To briefly summarise, the Sabbatean-Frankists are a heretical Messianic Jewish cult originating in the 1600s who many researchers view as Satanic and/or Luciferian (arguments go on forever about whether or not there’s a difference). Obsessed with the esoteric mystical tradition of the Kabbalah, the Frankists would become closely affiliated with freemasonry, hijack Judaism via Zionism, and in the post WWII era this Frankist/Masonic force has managed to carve out it’s own state – i.e. Israel.  The goal is to bring about the fulfillment of Jewish Messianic prophesy using the apocalyptic end times narrative found in the Biblical Book of Revelation.

Note: Interestingly, the day before the Notre Dame and Al-Aqsa mosque fires, a fire broke out at the Church of St John the Divine in Manhatten (St John is the supposed author of Revelation). This does beg the question… could there be something more esoteric and symbolic going on with these fires?

Whether the Masonic/Frankist elite are true believers or simply using Jews along with Talmudic and Biblical prophesies as a way to gain world control can be debated. Researcher into secret societies and arcane history, David Livingstone, believes that the elite view the Book of Revelation as a Kabbalistic text. When asked in a podcast interview about the elite’s beliefs regarding Revelation he responded:

“I actually believe that they are trying to deliberately fulfil the Book Of Revelations, not because they believe it’s a Christian book but because they believe it’s a Kabbalistic book.”

Livingstone views the Sabbateans as an outgrowth of a much older Kabbalistic secret society underground, believing the Sabbatean movement to be a creation of the earlier Rosicrucian order. In his book, Terrorism And The Illuminati, livingstone states that the Kabbalah:

…disguises itself as Jewish but is a pact to seek world domination, and the eradication of religion in favour of the worship of Lucifer.

The goal devised by these Kabbalists has since been the installation of their “messiah” as world leader, who, according to their interpretation of the Bible, is to be of the line of King David. Since that time, to preserve this purported lineage, until the advent of their expected leader, these Luciferians have been carefully intermarrying amongst each other, and have included among them many of the leading figures of history. (PDF p22]

Others take a more cynical view, believing the elite to simply be using well known religious prophesies as a blueprint because the public is familiar with them and already have them in their collective psyche.

Jewish Supremacy & the Noahide Laws

Whatever the case regarding the elite’s beliefs, certainly the notions of Jewish supremacy and prophesies of Jewish world domination found in the Talmud have, at the very least, been useful to them in their endeavours. One popular Israeli Rabbi who exemplified such supremacist beliefs was Ovadia Yosef who once said the following in reference to non-Jews:

“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world; only to serve the People of Israel,”

“Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat,”

“With gentiles, it will be like any person: They need to die, but God will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money. This is his servant. That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew,”

Yosef was not a small-time fringe figure. His funeral was the largest in Israel’s history and brought a reported 800,000 mourners onto the streets of Jerusalem. The US Ambassador to Israel, Dan Shapiro, described Yosef as “a spiritual leader to hundreds of thousands, if not more.”

While many in the alt-right/alt-lite camp warn of an Islamic agenda to impose Sharia Law, they never mention the Jewish Noahide Laws which Talmudic Rabbinical Judaism seeks to impose on the world. These are laws supposedly passed down through Noah (of Noah’s Ark fame). An article from Haaretz (which doesn’t work if you use an ad blocker but is reposted on the If Americans Knew blog) explains that the extreme Zionist organisation Chabad Lubavitch is hard at work developing the Noahide religion which aims to get non-Jews to worship Jews as a superior divine race. The If American’s Knew site gives this introduction to the piece:

The Noahide Project has the support of Israel’s Chief Rabbinate and the Israeli government. Noahides are members of a new religion founded by rabbis from Israel, mainly from Chabad and the religious Zionist movement – a form of Zionist mission that seeks to create a world religion whose believers adore the Jewish people and the State of Israel… the first Noahide gathering took place in Texas in 1990 and was attended by Rabbi Meir Kahane…

The Haaretz article states:

But who are these Noahides? They are members of a new religion, subordinate to Judaism, founded by rabbis from Israel, mainly from Chabad and the religious Zionist movement.

The piece focuses on the research of Rachel Z. Feldman, a religious studies professor from Pennsylvania who visited a Noahide community (i.e. non-Jews who follow the Noahide laws) in the Phillipines. The article states (emphasis added):

Feldman quotes one members of the community, who explained to her, “You are very lucky because you are white, and white people are rulers of the earth. But you are also a Jew. You are very gifted because you have blood from the Chosen people, from Abraham and Isaac.” In his sermons, Villegas explains why his community is forbidden to uphold Jewish commandments, and dwells on the essence of the difference between Noahides and Jews. Jews, he says, possess an inner sanctity that draws them close to a divine level: “The Jew has five levels of soul while the Noahide only has three levels and remains on an animalistic level, and this is written in the Kabbalah.”

This is what these people are taught by these Zionist Chabad Rabbis. The piece continues:

Feldman points out that the first Noahide gathering, which took place in Texas in 1990, was attended by Rabbi Meir Kahane [founder of the violent Jewish Defense League (JDL)]. After Kahane’s assassination, that same year, the Temple Institute, which advocates the building of the Third Temple on Jerusalem, on the site of the first two, started to promote the Noahide project. In the view of the institute’s rabbis, the gentiles’ upholding of the Seven Laws is an important stage in the messianic process at the height of which the temple will be built and Israel will become a theocracy that will gain the gentiles’ support.

The Noahide Laws are the intended ‘world religion’ designed to control the goy under the Jewish Messianic system. The piece concludes (emphasis added):

This is the world order being promoted by the Noahide Project, which has the support of Israel’s Chief Rabbinate and of the Israeli government. The Noahide theological project is closely related to Netanyahu’s foreign policy approach, which is based on religious support for Israel. As he worded the theological message he offered on Humanity Day in 2015, “The Seven Mitzvot of the Children of Noah are matters of both faith and morality, which according to our sages obligate all of the non-Jewish peoples of the world. These commandments serve as a basis for establishing a civilized society.”

The final goal of Rabbi Cherki and the Noahide World Center, we are told, is a modest one: seven billion believers.

Note: While the Noahide laws are somewhat conservative, the Frankists believe that they can speed up the coming of the Messiah by making the world sinful. Therefore, the Masonic/Frankist force promotes extreme liberalism to turn traditional values on their head. Some view their “redemption through sin” rationale as a cover for satanic activity.

Jews push mass-migration:

I mentioned earlier in this post the prominent role of Jews in aiding the mass-migration of Muslim and third-world migrants into Europe. I’ve covered this elsewhere but I’ll briefly touch on it here as it’s relevant.

Barbara Lerner Specter is the head of a Swedish based Jewish studies organisation called Paideia. In 2010 she made the following statement in an interview with an Israeli television network (emphasis added):

“I think there’s a resurgence of antisemitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural, and I think we’re going be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role, and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.”

A Jewish organisation that lobbies to bring refugees to the US is HIAS (Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society). Last year a spokesperson for the group said (emphasis added):

The Jewish community is speaking up quite loudly on behalf of refugees and just as loudly against xenophobia and Islamophobia. With a clear voice we are saying we will love our neighbour. Last week HIAS organized a letter signed by over 1200 rabbis … who agreed to ask our elected officials not to halt or even to limit the US refugee admissions program. It’s not just HIAS, Jewish organizations of all kinds across the spectrum of Judaism are issuing statements in support of refugees, including the Orthodox Union, the US Holocaust Memorial Museum, etc. HIAS works with affiliates throughout the US, partnering with local Muslim organizations so that as we resettle refugees we are building connections with local Muslim organizations and people in the places where we are doing this work. We’re going to continue to build and strengthen the movement of American Jews who are compelled to act, whether it is through advocacy, education, volunteering, in response to this enormous and untenable refugee crisis.

Reacting to the comments, Brandon Martinez of wrote:

Open borders is Western Jewry’s official policy. All of their powerful organizations get behind it, while hypocritically backing Israel’s closed border policy to non-Jews and refugees. This seemingly unreal Jewish double standard of open borders for white countries but separation, segregation and closed borders for Israel has angered many white people who wish to protect their culture.

Martinez is an alt-right figure who doesn’t shy away from covering issues related to Jews and Zionism. On the issue of multiculturalism and open borders he writes in his book Grand Deceptions (relevant chapter available online here):

It is beyond the scope of this chapter to cover in detail the inner workings of every Western country’s descent into the multicultural/multi-ethnic fold. But the pattern described here uniformly repeats itself across virtually the entire Western world: from Scandinavia to Germany, Switzerland, France, Spain, Australia, Canada and the United States, it has been predominately Jewish ethnic lobbying, activism and media campaigns that has led those countries to adopt liberal immigration policies and to embrace the ideals of multiculturalism, diversity and an “open, tolerant” society.

This issue of organized Jewry promoting refugees and open borders for Europe and the US (but not for Israel) is covered in two articles by The New Observer website. One about HIAS and another on the Israeli organisation IsraAID which helps to bring refugees to Europe. The latter article reports that IsraAid is part-funded by the Israeli government as well as a whole host of other Israeli and Jewish organisations. After highlighting the hypocrisy of Israel in its attempts to help refugees enter Europe whilst simultaneously trying to keep refugees out of Israel the article concludes:

So it is clear that the Jews understand—correctly—that a mass Third World invasion will destroy their country, and they are very clear and open about this fact.

Nonetheless, at the very same time, they are actively funding and aiding a mass Third World invasion of Europe—knowing full well that this will destroy Europe.

This overt hypocrisy cannot be a coincidence: it is the result of a malicious, deliberate policy, designed to destroy Europe and Europeans, while ensuring that Israel remains racially pure.

A notorious globalist philanthropist who promotes the open borders philosophy is George Soros. His son, Alex Soros, told the New York Times that his father’s work stemmed from his Jewish identity. The article states (emphasis added):

When the caffeine finally kicked in, Alex told me that for many years, his father had not been eager to advertise his Judaism because “this was something he was almost killed for.” But he had always “identified firstly as a Jew,” and his philanthropy was ultimately an expression of his Jewish identity, in that he felt a solidarity with other minority groups and also because he recognized that a Jew could only truly be safe in a world in which all minorities were protected. Explaining his father’s motives, he said, “The reason you fight for an open society is because that’s the only society that you can live in, as a Jew — unless you become a nationalist and only fight for your own rights in your own state.

This prompted Brandon Martinez to react by stating:

Well, there it is, confirmation that George Soros is motivated in his anti-White hostility primarily by his Jewish ethnicity and beliefs. It’s been written that Soros has a “Messiah Complex” and wants to govern the world. All of this fits nicely with the actual aims of Messianic Judaism to rule the world from Jerusalem and slay all the Gentiles that stand in the way of this monstrous conspiracy.

When we speak of Jewish conspiracy, we mean it literally – that Jews are getting together behind closed doors to map out the destruction of Gentiles. What happens in the offices of Soros’ various foundations besides exactly that? What happens in the offices of the Anti-Defamation League, the World Jewish Congress, B’nai B’rith and other Jewish groups? They scheme and plan out, behind the backs of their Gentile hosts, how to increase the wealth and power of Jews and also how to unseat their Gentile hosts from power, rob their wealth and open their borders to hostile third world invaders.

Many claim that Soros is anti-Zionist because he’s made some statements in the past which were critical of Israel. I would contend that this is a charade. After all, Soros’ whole shtick is to play the role of humanitarian and to essentially weaponize human right’s in the service of the one world project. As his target audience are Leftist progressives who’s sympathies mostly lay with the Palestinians, he would have no credibility with them if he was to be an open and vehement supporter of Israel. Of course, his so called humanitarianism is a charade too, he once told the US TV show 60 minutes:

“I am basically there to make money. I cannot, and do not, look at the social consequences of what I do.”

Wars for Israel create the refugee flows:

Another element to all of this is that the wars and conflicts that have created the refugees that are now appearing in the West have all been in the service of Israel. The early Zionist thinker Theodore Herzl stated that Israel should encompass the entirety of the land between the Nile and Euphrates rivers, or as he put it: “from the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.” The pursuit of Israeli expansion is often referred to as the Greater Israel Project and involves the destabilisation of countries and removal of Arab leaders that stand in the way of Israeli dominance of the Middle-East. Such plans have been proposed in documents such as the Oded Yinon Plan in the 1980s and the Clean Break document in the 90s. In 2000 a neocon think tank in the US called the Project For A New American Century (PNAC) drew up a document titled Rebuilding Americas Defences which took these previous ideas, refreshed and updated them, and proposed them as potential US foreign policy. Those neocons would soon form the core of the George W. Bush administration. The neocons are extremely Israel-centric, former CIA officer Phillip Giraldi wrote of them in his article Americas Jews Are Driving Americas Wars (emphasis added):

neocons as a group were founded by Jews and are largely Jewish, hence their universal attachment to the state of Israel. They first rose into prominence when they obtained a number of national security positions during the Reagan Administration and their ascendancy was completed when they staffed senior positions in the Pentagon and White House under George W. Bush. Recall for a moment Paul Wolfowitz, Doug Feith, and Scooter Libby. Yes, all Jewish and all conduits for the false information that led to a war that has spread and effectively destroyed much of the Middle East. Except for Israel, of course. Philip Zelikow, also Jewish, in a moment of candor, admitted that the Iraq War, in his opinion, was fought for Israel.

The PNAC document would also state that a Pearl Harbor style event could create the momentum required to speed up this agenda. One year after the document’s publication 9/11 occurred which I – and many others – contend was a Neocon/Mossad operation to kick-start a war/destabilisation agenda in the Middle-East for the benefit of Israel and to begin the roll-out of a police state agenda across the West using the spectre of “Islamic” terrorism. See my post on 9/11 for more.

It’s not my intention to go too much into this topic here. I covered the basics in a previous post and this article by Mark Weber on the Iraq war is useful. Needless to say, Syria and Libya – from where we’ve seen so many refugees either come from or transit through on their way to Europe – were also on the neocon’s hit-list… and Iran still is.

Also, see the video Wars For Israel Drive Mass Migration by Mark Collett


So, to sum up. I don’t know how the fire in Notre Dame got started. I don’t necessarily believe the French authorities when they say it was accidental, but I don’t know any more than anyone else does what happened there. But the reaction from the alt-Right – especially the alt-lite branch  – has been typical. To them, Islam is the only threat and Muslims the only troublemakers. Hopefully I’ve managed to show that that isn’t the case.

Clearly there is a historical grudge that many influential Rabbis hold against Christianity, and there is also a belief that “God’s chosen people” are destined to rule the world. These chosenites promote mass migration with some Rabbis even connecting it to Jewish Messianic prophesy. The Zionist controlled alt-lite push the anti-Islam narrative through its media outlets and personalities – pitting the chosenites’ two main rivals against each other. The ‘clash of civilisations’ resulting from the West/Christianity vs Islam narrative allows Zionist and Masonic controlled governments to curb freedoms in the West using the excuse of combating extremism – both Islamic and “far-Right” – and often based on staged false-flag events carried out as part of a ‘strategy of tension’. Meanwhile, Jewish-created Cultural Marxism gets pushed through Left-wing media and academia and, along with Jewish-run Hollywood, promotes integration and multiculturalism to the middle-of-the-road “normies” (who are the majority) helping the elites to advance the global culture whilst they chase down, demonise, and silence those who dissent.

There is much more I could go into on this topic. I could talk about Trump’s slavish devotion to Israel (although I do go into that here), I could go into the (heavily Jewish) Frankfurt School and how the modern day Left has been molded to play it’s part in the elite’s agenda (but you can get the basics here). There’s the issue of evangelical Christian Zionism and how the elite created that movement (see here). There’s also a Russian dimension to all this which I’m probably not quite honed up on enough to do the subject justice, yet (but Sean Jobst has written a good piece detailing Putin’s links to Chabad Lubavitch here). There’s also the issue of how the Sabbateans connect to Islam via the Donmeh sect, how this may have led to Wahabism, and the possibility that the Saudi royal dynasty may be Donmeh (i.e. Sabbatean) crypto-Jews (see here, here and here). Also, there’s the suggestion that the Sabbatean/Masonic elites were behind the creation of the Nazis as an assault on Europe’s non-Zionist Jews and to generate the urgency and justification required for the creation of Israel (see here). Then there’s the Frankist links to Karl Marx (see here). Ultimately, this is a huge topic that to cover it all would mean writing a book-length post which I’m sure neither of us want. One thing is for sure, the story is a lot bigger than the black and white narrative spread by the kosher Right-wingers which ignores the puppet masters and portrays current events as a simple West vs Islam issue.

I’d like to finish up by pointing out that when it comes to Jews, Muslims, or any other group for that matter, most people generally fall into the “normie” catagory and typically go about their day to day lives minding their own business. Even those who might harbour certain negative beliefs about other groups generally don’t engage in any conspiratorial action against them. But the Kabbalistic Sabbatean-Frankists and their Freemasonic brethren create all manner of cults/movements/ideologies within populations which some people do get caught up in. They are then used to advance the elite’s social engineering schemes. From the elite’s point of view, the art is in playing these various parties off against each other towards a certain end goal. This managing of opposing forces towards certain ends is, itself, derived from Kabbalah and is a calling card of Masonic/Frankist manipulation.

Video Section:

In the video below, Adam Green of Know More News looks at the Notre Dame fire and covers much information similar in theme to what I’m presenting in this post (alternative link here):

In this video Green covers the topic of Chabad Lubavitch and the Noahide Laws (alternative link here):

In this video Green covers the Third Temple prophesy:

In the video below, Brandon Martinez covers the role of Jews in promoting mass-migration by highlighting their own words and statements [UPDATE: video now banned by YouTube but is the second video on this page]:

Mark Collett looks at how wars for Israel drive migration:

Russ Winter of appears on Our Interesting Times to discuss the Sabbatean-Frankists (mp3 here):

This episode of Powers and Principalities asks the question Who is They? It gets into the close-knit relationship between Freemasonry and Jewish elites (mp3 here):

A short video looking at passages from the Jewish Talmud:

%d bloggers like this: